Friday 30 December 2016

Face Of Animal's Owner Is Hidden In This Tricky Puzzle


There is a new optical illusion sweeping the web - and it could well be the toughest yet.
Hidden in the vintage illustration of a dog is the head of his master - but can you spot him?
The image, posted by Playbuzz, dates back to the turn of the century and was the face of a trade card used as an early advertising gimmick


If you look closely, you can spot the dog's owner in the middle of the picture - with Spot's ear acting as his hat. 
On the side of his cheek you might be able to make out his eyes, nose and mouth - but you'll have to tilt your head to spot it.


People took to the comments section of the Playbuzz website to comment on the difficulty of spotting the dog straight away, with one saying that they're usually good at optical illusions but struggled with this one. 
Others, however, said it only took them a couple of seconds - so how did you do? 



Another offering from Playbuzz claims that just one person in every 2,000 will be able to pass the puzzle.
The aim of the game is to try to work out what shape or letter the number 2's in each image form.
1. 
Can you pass the latest test by Playbuzz? See if you can find the 2's and what shape they are 


Can you pass the latest test by Playbuzz? See if you can find the 2's and what shape they are 
It might sound easy enough but be warned, the number 2's are hidden among lots more number 5's. 
When you look long enough, the numbers appear to blend into each other which makes it difficult to decipher what the number 2's are trying to form. 
Luckily, Playbuzz gives you multiple choice answers to make things a little easier.
It is just one in a very long line of puzzles and brainteasers sweeping the web this week so take a chance and see how many you can get right and you might just be the one in 2,000. 

2. 
Which shape do the 2's form this time? It could be a square, circle, rectangle or triangle 
Which shape do the 2's form this time? It could be a square, circle, rectangle or triangle 
3. 

No comments: